![]() |
The meme is wrong but raises an interesting point. |
Earlier this week, I posted the following on Facebook.
"There is a meme making the rounds that says Canada is the largest purchaser of Kentucky bourbon. That is false. The largest purchaser of Kentucky Bourbon is the United States, but among export markets Canada is only fifth, after the EU, Australia, Japan, and the UK. Export is about 20% of total sales and Canada is about 5% of the export market. So, yes, Canada is an important market and tariffs are bad, but those are the actual facts."
The meme in question is reproduced above. It's still wrong and my statement above is still correct, but in conversations about the meme and my response, I learned something interesting. Canada is, in fact, Kentucky's largest export market for distilled spirits products of all types. That means whiskey but also other things, such as vodka, gin, liqueurs, brandy and tequila.
Wait a minute! Brandy and tequila? I know Kentucky has a small grape crop and a few wineries, some of which also make brandy, but that's very small volume. Tequila! That has to be made in Mexico, so that can't be right.
Some Tequila can be shipped in bulk, be bottled in the U.S., and still be called Tequila. If that happens in Kentucky, as it does at several producers, then it counts as a Kentucky export. Brandy is an even bigger part of the equation. Of the five best selling California brandies, three are distilled in California from California grapes, but the distillate is shipped to Kentucky where it is aged in used bourbon barrels, then bottled. That, too, becomes a Kentucky product and a Kentucky export.
The source for this statistic is the Kentucky Distillers Association (KDA), specifically KDA's annual report on "The Economic and Fiscal Impacts of the Distilling Industry in Kentucky," Prepared for the Kentucky Distillers’ Association by Paul Coomes, Ph.D., Economic Consultant and Emeritus Professor of Economics, University of Louisville, and Barry Kornstein, Economic Consultant. This is from the 2023 report. The 2024 report hasn't been released yet.
The page you want is #68 in the printed version, #70 in the PDF. Although it mentions "liqueurs and cordials," it's also those other things. If it gets bottled in and distributed from Kentucky, it's a Kentucky product. If it's then shipped out of the country, it's a Kentucky export.
Heaven Hill and Sazerac, especially, produce full lines of value brands in virtually every distilled spirits category. If you're the LCBO (the liquor distributor for the Canadian province of Ontario) and you're buying a few pallets of bourbon and rye, why not throw in a few pallets of triple sec, coffee liqueur, or peppermint schnapps? Canada produces some of that stuff too, but Kentucky's big producers make so much of it they can compete favorably with Canada's smaller producers.
If you look at the graph, you will see that only in exports to Canada are the two segments, whiskey and "all other spirits" roughly equal. And that makes Canada #1 for spirits exports from Kentucky.
Although some Canadian whisky is bottled in Kentucky, I believe that is only for the U.S. market. It's not exported back to Canada. Likewise, U.S.-bottled Tequila isn't exported back to Mexico, but some of it goes to Canada. All that will, of course, change if there's a trade war.
So, if the meme had said "the largest export market for Kentucky distilled spirits is Canada," it would be correct.
Kentucky is a small state, and because it produces so much whiskey, distilled spirits are one of its largest industries. Except for its Democratic governor and the representative from Louisville, all of its major elected officials are Republican. The legislature has a veto-proof Republican majority and Trump won Kentucky by 26 points.
Why does it matter? Canada, any way you slice it, is a huge buyer of Kentucky products. They have been a stable trading partner for decades. They are the tenant who never makes a fuss and always pays the rent on time. Tariffs may have been a disaster in 1789, 1807, 1809, 1816, 1824, 1828, 1832, 1842, 1861, 1890, 1922, and 1930, but this time it feels different!
ReplyDeleteWell it matters because the facts/truth should always be important. I know that really isn't a fashionable opinion these days. And it shouldn't matter whether the fact support your beliefs/opinion/political side. All sides tend to forget this when it is convenient for them.
ReplyDeleteI spent the better part of my working life as a Research Director/VP of Research or something similar. I understand how much data is presented to purposefully mislead the intended audience. (Torture numbers long enough, and they will confess to anything.)
When marketing gets the data, they typically tend to warp it further. And since most reporters have little knowledge of methodology, sample selection, standards of reporting etc. they tend to just report what the press releases or their sources supply.
Annon is correct. Either way Canada is an important market and IMO is one of our closest allies in trade and international affairs. Canada deserves better treatment than this administration has shown them IMO, of course.
But does changing the actual post from "Bourbon" to "distilled spirits" make the claim any weaker? How? IMO (again) the straight up truth typically makes a better story, particularly in this case.
Respectfully sir, it was a social media post—complete with emojis—not a doctoral thesis. The bigger problem is that many take social media posts—complete with emojis—as gospel. At least her post wasn’t an anti-truth, like say, just off the top of my head, someone claiming Ukraine started the war with Russia.
ReplyDeleteI just took the opportunity to tell the whole story. When did that become a bad thing?
ReplyDeleteIt isn’t. I’m here because I love and appreciate your work. The whole story is Kentucky is screwed if the federal government decides to proceed with tariffs—no matter the style of spirits.
ReplyDeleteSeriously, Chuck. I don't get that at all. It's not like you were pointing out some grammatical/misspelling error. Why argue against the truth? And if one thinks it doesn't matter, why comment? The truth should matter. Whatever the format. IMO of course. 🙃
ReplyDeleteI always appreciate clarity, even if others don't. And I always use my name.
ReplyDeleteI truly don’t get why my “anonymous” comments are so controversial? Yes, obviously, an entire story is always better than a partial one, but, in this instance, it’s not nearly as important as the bigger picture—the crushing effects tariffs will have on the Kentucky economy. Experiencing a real forest for the trees moment here.
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous: Because you began your comment with "Why does it matter?" you seemed to be defending the incorrect meme and came off as more hostile than you probably intended. Being anonymous amplified that. And you seemed to miss the point of my post because you wanted so badly to make your own point. I think we've played it out. Have a nice day.
ReplyDeleteI just thought your point was pointless. Have a nice day as well.
ReplyDeleteSo now we know the hostility we all sensed was intentional after all.
ReplyDelete